In recent times, Martin Short has been the talk of the town, but not for the reasons you might think. A controversial essay by Slate attempted to decipher why people continue to embrace Martin Short, the Canadian actor, writer, and comedian born in 1950. While some criticism was thrown his way, the internet has rallied behind this beloved actor. In this article, we’ll delve into the essence of Martin Short’s comedic appeal and explore the reactions to the Slate essay.
The Versatile Martin Short
Martin Short, a versatile entertainer who has garnered accolades ranging from Emmys to Tonys, remains active in the entertainment industry well into his 70s. Known for his roles in various TV shows and his memorable performances on “Saturday Night Live,” Short has left an indelible mark on the world of comedy.
Deciphering the Slate Essay
The crux of Slate’s essay, titled “Why We Keep Putting Up with Martin,” revolved around dissecting the elements of Martin Short’s comedic style. The essay questioned whether Short is a bona fide comic genius or if he resorts to any means necessary to elicit laughter.
Is Martin Short a Comic Genius or Simply Amusing?
The essay’s author, Dan Kois, did not mince words when he expressed his opinion that Martin Short is “devastatingly unfunny” and that he would go to great lengths to elicit laughter. However, Kois also acknowledged moments where Short’s genuine talent shone through, making it a matter of personal preference.
Kois articulated his viewpoint by stating, “I find Martin Short’s whole schtick exhausting, sweaty, and desperately unfunny. Throughout his evolution from sketch-comedy standout to uneasy movie star to twice-failed talk-show host to enthusiastic song-and-dance man, I’ve wrinkled my nose. Every time he dresses up in a silly outfit or says something outrageous or mugs for the audience, I want to shout at the screen: Why are you being like this?”
Ultimately, the appreciation of Martin Short’s comedic style is subjective, with audiences divided on whether they find his antics amusing or exasperating. However, it is undeniable that he holds a significant place in the world of comedy.
Fan Reactions to the Essay
After the Slate article gained traction on the internet, fans of Martin Short came to his defense, offering a resounding show of support.
Deborah, an avid fan of the comedian, took to Twitter to express her admiration, stating, “A hit piece on Martin Short? Who hurt you? He’s a good actor, terrific comedian, and if you don’t see it, that’s your failure. I sure wouldn’t be advertising my stupidity in print. BTW, I worked with him once—one of the sweetest people ever.”
Others highlighted Martin Short’s impeccable comedic timing, with one Twitter user remarking, “‘Martin Short isn’t funny’ doesn’t need an argument because it’s not even a thing. It’s like someone saying, ‘The sun isn’t hot!’ You just smile at that person and hope they get the help they need.”
Additionally, some fans pointed out the resilience and humanity of Martin Short, noting his enduring love for his late wife, Nancy, who passed away in 2010 due to ovarian cancer. Despite her loss, Short continues to cherish her memory, regularly engaging in conversations with her about life.
Conclusion
In the midst of the controversy sparked by the Slate essay, one thing remains clear—Martin Short’s comedic legacy is deeply appreciated by a substantial fan base. While opinions on his style may vary, his undeniable talent and enduring humanity have solidified his place as a beloved figure in the world of entertainment. Whether you find him hilariously funny or mildly perplexing, there’s no denying that Martin Short’s contributions to comedy have left an indelible mark that will endure for generations to come.